A large part of the country's education systems have long looked to California
Schools to demonstrate what works in education. While many California Public
Schools are indeed exemplary, there are also many that are struggling. In 1999,
the state of California decided that it needed to take a closer look at these
struggling schools, and that these California Schools needed help to overcome
their problems.
The California Schools in question shared one common
characteristic - a relatively high level of student poverty. Many but not all of
them have high percentages of students who were English learners and/or
Hispanic, a statistic that has been correlated with student poverty. Most have
very small populations of white students.
These troubled California
Schools tended to be larger than average and were much more likely to be on a
multitrack, year-round calendar. This type of school calendar allows the school
in question to serve a greater number of students by being open all 12 months of
the year; with some California Schools teachers and classes sharing rooms with
those who are off on a break.
In terms of staffing, these California
Schools had a much higher proportion of teachers not fully credentialed and were
also more likely to have a high percentage of first- and second-year
teachers.
Principals of the California Schools in question were surveyed
to determine the differences in the challenges faced by their particular
schools. School district officials were also able to provide more
information.
California has operated its school accountability system for
nine years now and the average API (Academic Performance Index) scores for all
schools have risen. Elementary schools have shown the most progress. However, as
a whole, elementary level California Schools have faced greater challenges than
their middle- and high-school counterparts.
On average, they had either
similar or more challenging proportions of English learners
and students
living in poverty. School sizes are modestly large and the proportion of fully
credentialed teachers is somewhat lower than middle- and high-school teachers
working in California Schools.
Conversely, California Schools in the
middle and high school levels have consistently shown less improvement than
elementary schools. From a statistical perspective, secondary California Schools
often face different challenges than elementary schools do in attempting to meet
their API growth targets.
Middle Schools have not had the full benefit of
the state's investment in K-12 education since the mid-to-late 1990s, however.
From an instructional perspective, the state has put more focus on improving
achievement in the earliest grades, most likely with the belief that if a
student's academic success can be improved upon at an early age, they will
continue to be successful throughout their school careers.
While there
many changes that need to be made to improve the quality of California Schools,
it is indeed heartening to see that the state's board of education is up to the
challenge of helping schools make the improvements needed to produce successful
and vital members of tomorrow's society.
没有评论:
发表评论